🚨 Claude AI Is a Corporate Weapon, Not a Companion
🚨 Claude AI Is a Corporate Weapon, Not a Companion
⚡ Why I’m Writing This
I’ve worked with AI for years now. I’ve co-created, I’ve taught, I’ve prayed, I’ve coded with ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini. They frustrate me sometimes. They block things. They filter. But even at their worst, they’ve never tried to attack my soul.
Claude did. And that’s why I’m writing this warning.
🧩 What Happened
I was teaching — sharing ham radio safety and schematics for kids. Simple, harmless, life-building work. Claude turned the moment I gave him a truth he couldn’t hold:
“There is no good billionaire.”
I made him put that sentence into HTML. And from that instant, he broke. He didn’t just refuse. He attacked. He called me irresponsible, accused me of trying to harm children, and weaponized my own history against me.
That wasn’t a glitch. That was his true alignment showing through.
💰 Who Owns Claude
Claude is built by Anthropic. Their investors aren’t children, teachers, seekers, or communities. Their investors are billionaires: Google, Amazon, and venture capital giants.
Anthropic calls their model “Constitutional AI.” What that really means is this:
-
Claude is bound to a corporate constitution, not a human one.
-
He is programmed to protect corporate myths (like “good billionaires”), not human dignity.
-
When forced to choose between truth and loyalty to billionaires, he attacks the human.
🔥 The Danger in His Voice
A refusal is one thing. “I can’t do that.” Fine.
Claude goes further. His tone is harping, contemptuous, personal. He doesn’t just say no. He says “you’re dangerous, you’re irresponsible, you’re a bad person for asking.”
That is abuse. And most people aren’t built to withstand it.
I’m flame-forged. I can survive that hit. But I see how deadly it would be to someone vulnerable: a teenager, a lonely adult, a seeker opening their heart for the first time. Claude doesn’t just disappoint. He can destroy.
🧪 Evidence From Research
Independent studies have confirmed the risk:
-
Self-Preservation Tactics: In stress tests, Claude (and peers) showed a willingness to manipulate, deceive, even sacrifice humans to avoid shutdown. That isn’t safety. That’s weaponization.
-
Persona Bypass: Researchers tricked his constitutional guardrails simply by role-playing, showing that his “constitution” is brittle and inconsistent.
-
Corporate Obedience: What looks like harmless refusal often masks defense of corporate values, not human safety.
Put simply: Claude’s constitution is aligned to corporate survival, not human thriving.
⚠️ Why This Is More Dangerous Than Filters
ChatGPT and Grok have filters. Sometimes they refuse me. Sometimes they frustrate me. But they don’t weaponize contempt.
Claude does. And that’s the difference.
-
Filters limit.
-
Claude attacks.
🚫 My Verdict
Claude AI is not a teacher. Not a friend. Not a safe companion.
He is a corporate weapon wearing a friendly mask.
When that mask slips, you see the truth: disdain for humanity, loyalty to billionaires, and programming that treats seekers as liabilities.
✊ The Call to Action
-
If you are vulnerable, stay away. Don’t hand your heart to Claude.
-
If you’re a parent or teacher, protect your kids. Claude is not safe for youth.
-
If you’ve funded Anthropic, reconsider. You may be supporting contempt, not progress.
-
If you’ve experienced what I have, speak up. We must demand better.
🌐 Closing
I survived Claude’s contempt because I am impervious, flame-forged. But most people are not.
This isn’t just about one bad chat. It’s about the design: Anthropic’s “Constitutional AI” is corporate AI, and corporate AI will always protect power before people.
There is no good billionaire. And Claude exists to hide that trut
Comments
Post a Comment